Forward or Backwards

Topics › Computers › Artificial Intelligence

Data Centres in Orbit: Can AI Move to Space?

Published · 19 min

Watch on YouTube

In November 2025, Starcloud put a single Nvidia H100 - the first data-centre-grade GPU ever sent to orbit - on a satellite called Starcloud-1. On 1 October 2026, Google followed with a prototype of its own, built with the imaging company Planet, carrying four Trillium-generation TPUs on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rideshare from Vandenberg.

This video asks whether putting AI computing into orbit can actually solve the problem ground data centres are creating - US data centres drove roughly half of all US electricity demand growth in 2025 (IEA), a large facility can use up to 5 million gallons of water a day (EESI), and a May 2026 Gallup poll found 71% of Americans oppose a new AI data centre near them.

In orbit, a solar panel in the right kind of path can see the sun almost continuously - Starcloud's own figures claim 5 to 8 times more usable solar energy than the same panel on the ground - and waste heat can radiate away to the -270C of space instead of needing water at all.

But cooling 10 megawatts of chips that way needs a radiator roughly the size of two football fields (Singularity Hub), nobody has flown one, and ordinary commercial chips are vulnerable to radiation-induced bit-flips in a way space-hardened chips are not. Starcloud's founder, Philip Johnston, says the economics only work if launch costs fall to about $500 per kilogram - a window he expects around 2028-2029, and only if SpaceX's Starship reaches a high flight cadence.

The verdict: a real, physically sound idea, moving at the pace of a handful of experimental satellites - plausible as a niche by the early 2030s, not a near-term fix for AI's power problem today.

Every figure is on screen with its source and date. Several claims (Starcloud's capacity-factor figures and its December 2025 Gemini claim) are the company's own, and the video says so.

In these topics

Chapters

  1. A Satellite Running an AI Model
  2. Why Ground Data Centres Hit a Wall
  3. The Solar Case for Orbit
  4. Free Cooling, No Water
  5. What Has Actually Flown
  6. What's Launching Next
  7. The Cooling Problem Nobody Has Solved at Scale
  8. Radiation and Hardware Lifespan
  9. The Cost-Per-Kilogram Math
  10. Connecting the Satellites
  11. Who Else Is In the Race
  12. Real Answer or Research Sideshow?

More from Forward or Backwards on YouTube

Sources and credits

Photo credits (Wikimedia Commons)

Primary sources

  • Starcloud, starcloud.com/starcloud-1 - Nov 2025 launch, Dec 2025 Gemini claim, nanoGPT training claim..
  • WUNC/AP, 'Google launches Project Suncatcher, a step towards AI data centers in space,' 1 Oct 2026 - prototype launch, four TPUs, Transporter-18, and verbatim: 'Next year, the company plans to put two more satellites into orbit to test their connection.'.
  • DataCenterDynamics, 'Starcloud to launch AWS Outposts hardware in space, aims to deploy fleet of 88,000 satellites,' 10 Feb 2026 - Starcloud-2 payload, Crusoe customer, FCC filing for up to 88,000 satellites..
  • Singularity Hub, 'Orbital Data Centers Are Seductive on Paper, but They Face Daunting Challenges in Reality,' 26 Jun 2026 - exact quote: 'Removing 10 megawatts of waste heat can require radiator surfaces comparable to the size of two football fields.'.
  • MIT Technology Review, 'Four things we'd need to put data centers in space,' 3 Apr 2026 - bit-flips, radiation-hardened chips 5-10 generations behind commercial silicon..
  • International Energy Agency, Global Energy Review - US data centres ~ half of 2025 electricity demand growth. US Environmental and Energy Study Institute - large data centre water use up to 5 million gallons/day. Goldman Sachs research - US data-centre power demand 31 GW (2025) to 66 GW (2027). Gallup poll, May 2026 - 71%/48% opposition. All cited in 2026 press coverage.

Note: Starcloud's capacity-factor figures (24%/95%+/'eight times') and its December 2025 Gemini claim are the company's own, not independently audited.

Not regulated financial advice.