Forward or Backwards

Topics › Energy › Natural Gas

Methane Satellites: Can Seeing Leaks Cut Emissions?

Published · 26 min

Watch on YouTube

How does a methane satellite measurement become evidence about a source on the ground — and can that evidence lead to lower emissions?

This video follows reflected infrared sunlight, methane columns, plume attribution, wind-based emission estimates, observation gaps and independent validation. It examines the Chubut response, the Hassi Messaoud observations, Tanager-1 at Karachi, MethaneSAT’s loss, MEDUSA’s July 2026 protocol and MARS’s expansion to coal and waste.

A response to an alert is not automatically an emissions cut. No detected plume is not proof of zero emissions. The evidence becomes useful when operators and authorities investigate, act and check the outcome. Sources and dates are documented in the accompanying fact sheet.

Educational documentary. Not financial or investment advice.

In these topics

Chapters

  1. An invisible leak, a visible clue
  2. Why methane is worth finding
  3. From global maps to individual plumes
  4. Reading sunlight's fingerprint
  5. Which facility made the plume?
  6. Turning a column into tonnes per hour
  7. What the satellite misses
  8. Checking the measurement
  9. The sky is changing
  10. Who acts on an alert?
  11. Accountability needs a closed loop

More from Forward or Backwards on YouTube

Sources and credits

Photo credits (Wikimedia Commons)

Primary sources

Not regulated financial advice.