Forward or Backwards

Topics › Science › Biology

Bacterial Concrete: Can Buildings Heal Themselves?

Published · 13 min

Watch on YouTube

Water seeping into a concrete crack reaches the steel rebar inside, and the rust that follows takes up more space than the steel it replaces - widening the crack until a bridge or tunnel needs expensive repair. Bacterial self-healing concrete embeds dormant bacteria directly in the mix so the same water that causes the damage triggers its own repair.

The video traces the idea from TU Delft microbiologist Henk Jonkers, who began the research in 2006 and published it in 2010, through the alkali-tolerant Bacillus spores his team selected, the calcium lactate food source packaged into protective capsules, and the chemistry that turns a germinating spore into calcite - limestone's own mineral - sealing a crack from the inside.

It is equally clear about the limits: reliable self-sealing tops out at cracks of roughly 0.5 to 0.8 millimetres in lab tests, the TU Delft spin-off Basilisk (founded 2015) sells the technology commercially with a licensed Japanese production line running since 2020, and the company's claim that spores can stay dormant for up to 200 years is an extrapolation, not a result anyone has actually observed over that span. Self-healing concrete can also cost around 30% more upfront than the ordinary kind.

Every figure is on screen with its source and date.

In these topics

Chapters

  1. Cracks, water, rebar: why concrete fails
  2. The repair bill: why bridges & tunnels are expensive to fix
  3. The idea: concrete that heals like a bone
  4. Henk Jonkers and the Delft breakthrough
  5. Picking the bacteria: Bacillus and its alkaline spores
  6. The food source: calcium lactate and the capsule problem
  7. The chemistry: from bacteria to limestone
  8. How wide a crack this can actually close
  9. From lab to product: Basilisk and commercial use
  10. Does it survive decades in a real structure?
  11. The cost question: why concrete is cheap and this isn't, yet
  12. What it means for infrastructure lifespan

More from Forward or Backwards on YouTube

Sources and credits

Photo credits (Wikimedia Commons)

Primary sources

  • TU Delft, Jonkers lab research pages and publication history - Henk Jonkers began the research in 2006.
  • H. Jonkers et al., 'Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete,' Ecological Engineering (2010) - Bacillus pseudofirmus and B. cohnii, alkaliphilic spores, published 2010.
  • hollandcircularhotspot.nl, Basilisk company profile - Basilisk founded 2015, TU Delft spin-off, Corbion partnership.
  • materialdistrict.com, 'Living self-healing concrete' (2017) - lab/company crack-closing figure, up to roughly 0.5-0.8mm.
  • Kyodo News PR Wire, Aizawa Concrete press release (18 Aug 2022) - Basilisk HA NETIS registration HK-220003-A, 28 Jul 2022, up to ~1mm.
  • Government of Japan, 'Highlighting Japan,' 'Concrete that Repairs Itself' (Mar 2023) - Japan production from 2020; 200-year dormancy claim attributed to Aizawa Concrete research.
  • IDTechEx, 'Self-Healing Materials 2025-2035' (2025), via innovationintextiles.com and concreteconnect.co.uk summaries - biological approaches lead commercially; ~30% upfront cost premium.
  • Drexel University news release (8 Dec 2023); Khaneghahi, Farnam et al., Construction and Building Materials, vol. 408, 133765 (2023) - BioFiber bacterial delivery research.
  • UNEP, 'Greening Cement Production...'; World Cement Association white paper (2025); World Economic Forum white paper on concrete decarbonisation - cement at roughly 7-8% of global CO2 emissions.

Not regulated financial advice.