Forward or Backwards

Topics › Science › Space

The Lunar Economy: Who Actually Profits From the Moon

Published · 20 min

Watch on YouTube

Everyone is talking about a permanent lunar economy, and almost nobody is making money from it yet. This video follows NASA's Artemis II, which carried four astronauts to a record 252,756 miles from Earth on 6 April 2026, and the phased plan behind it: a south pole base with its initial elements due by 2030, built on commercial landers through NASA's CLPS contracts (raised to a 4.2 billion dollar ceiling in 2026) and on human landing systems from SpaceX and Blue Origin.

It explains the two resources everyone is chasing: water ice in permanently shadowed craters, split by sublimation and electrolysis into air and rocket fuel, and the oxygen locked in regolith itself; and KREEP, the potassium-rare earth-phosphorus rock concentrated around Oceanus Procellarum, mapped in a 2025 USGS fact sheet at 200 to 600 times the Solar System's average rare-earth concentration.

It follows China's own crewed landing goal, targeted before 2030 with hardware reported complete in 2026, alongside the slower, Russia-built International Lunar Research Station, and the August 2026 postponement of Chang'e-7, still without a new launch date.

And it sets PwC's 2021 estimate of a 170 billion dollar lunar economy by 2040, and Deloitte's 2026 estimate of 343 to 566 billion dollars by 2050, against the reality of Intuitive Machines' Q2 2026 results: record revenue, and a 62.8 million dollar loss. The video asks whether that gap between the promise and the numbers is a market still finding its feet, or a bet that has not paid off yet.

Educational documentary. Not financial or investment advice.

In these topics

Chapters

  1. The Lunar Promise
  2. Artemis II: The First Step
  3. The Roadmap to a Base
  4. The Commercial Middlemen
  5. The Heavy Lifters
  6. The Lunar Gold Rush
  7. Rare Earths and KREEP
  8. The China-Russia Alliance
  9. The Chang'e Setbacks
  10. The Profitability Paradox
  11. Forwards or Backwards?

More from Forward or Backwards on YouTube

Sources and credits

Photo credits (Wikimedia Commons)

Primary sources

  • NASA, 'NASA's Artemis II Crew Eclipses Record for Farthest Human Spaceflight', nasa.gov, 6 April 2026 - launch date, crew, the 248,655-mile and 252,756-mile figures, and the Lori Glaze quote.
  • PwC, lunar market assessment, 2021 - the original $170 billion cumulative lunar economy estimate through 2040.
  • Deloitte, 'Building the Lunar Economy', press release, deloitte.com, 26 August 2026 - the $343bn (conservative) to $566bn (accelerated) cumulative value through 2050.
  • GovConWire, 'NASA plans to raise the CLPS contract ceiling to $4.2 billion for continued launch services', 29 April 2026, reporting a NASA Johnson Space Center SAM.gov notice; corroborated by satnews.com (22 April 2026, 30 June 2026) and Eastern Herald (2 May 2026).
  • Intuitive Machines, Q2 2026 earnings results, reported 13 August 2026 (corroborated by Benzinga, OpenCapital, Webull) - $206.2m revenue, $62.8m net loss, -$0.29/share, $1.76bn backlog.
  • Newcastle Herald/Tenterfield Star (AP/Reuters wire), Scientific American, and Thailand's NARIT - Chang'e-7's 23 August 2026 postponement, status re-checked 21 October 2026 with no new launch date found.
  • USGS Fact Sheet 2025-3049, 'Rare Earth Elements on the Moon', Keszthelyi, Coyan, Pigue, Bennett and Gabriel, September 2025. - KREEP definition, the 200-600x (up to 1,000x+) concentration figures, the Procellarum KREEP Terrane area, and Apollo 15 Sample 15386.
  • SpaceNews/Scientific American/Asia Times/CGTN coverage of China's national crewed lunar landing programme (before-2030 goal, hardware status reported April 2026) and Space.com on the separate China-Russia International Lunar Research Station.
  • Scientific American ('NASA unveils ambitious new moon base plans') and National Geographic/NY1/Okaz coverage of NASA's south-pole base plan - the 2030 initial-elements directive, Artemis III (2027) and IV (2028), Shackleton crater and Mons Mouton as site candidates, and the contested 2032-2036 range for a full permanent presence, reported honestly as unsettled.
  • NTRS 20100033667/20100021942 and 2008 field-test coverage of NASA's ROxygen hydrogen-reduction system on Mauna Kea, Hawai'i, and NASA/wire coverage of the April 2023 Johnson Space Center Carbothermal Reduction Demonstration.

Note: None of the companies or programmes named is presented as profitable; the video states explicitly where each figure is a projection rather than a delivered result.

Not regulated financial advice.